Three Key Improvements Needed for eVisit's Pricing Model: Insights from 2023 Customer Feedback

In the rapidly evolving landscape of telemedicine, eVisit has emerged as a patient engagement software platform aimed at enhancing healthcare delivery for small to medium-sized provider practices. However, despite its innovative approach, eVisit's pricing model has come under scrutiny in 2023, with users expressing concerns that could be pivotal for the platform's continued success. This article delves into the three most significant areas where eVisit's pricing strategy could be improved, as highlighted by actual customer quotes from recent reviews.

1. Transparency in Pricing Structure

Customers have voiced confusion and dissatisfaction with the lack of clear information regarding eVisit's pricing. One customer stated, I was excited about the features, but the pricing structure was not as transparent as I had hoped. It was difficult to understand what exactly I was paying for. To address this, eVisit should consider a more straightforward pricing model that clearly outlines what each tier includes, eliminating any hidden fees or unexpected costs. This transparency would not only improve customer satisfaction but also build trust and potentially attract new users who value clear and upfront pricing.

2. Competitive Pricing to Match Market Standards

Another area of concern is the competitiveness of eVisit's pricing compared to other telemedicine solutions. A review from a small practice manager mentioned, We found the cost to be on the higher side when compared to other services that offer similar functionalities. In response, eVisit should conduct a thorough market analysis to ensure their pricing is in line with industry standards, taking into account the features and value they provide. Offering competitive pricing would make eVisit more accessible to a broader range of healthcare providers, especially those with limited budgets.

3. Flexible Pricing Options for Different Practice Sizes

The one-size-fits-all pricing model has been a point of contention for users with varying practice sizes. A solo practitioner noted, The pricing model seems more suited for larger practices. As a solo provider, I found it challenging to justify the cost. eVisit could greatly benefit from introducing scalable pricing options that cater to the diverse needs of individual practitioners as well as larger practices. By doing so, they would not only accommodate the financial constraints of smaller practices but also reinforce their commitment to supporting healthcare providers across the spectrum.

In conclusion, eVisit has the potential to be a game-changer in the telemedicine space, but to achieve that, it must listen to its customers and adapt its pricing model accordingly. By enhancing transparency, ensuring competitive pricing, and offering flexible options, eVisit can better meet the needs of its users and solidify its position as a preferred telemedicine platform for healthcare providers of all sizes.

Subscribe to our Curly's Consulting newsletter

We publish insights on all things pricing strategy and monetization.
Contact Us