Three Key Improvements for Asset Panda's Pricing Model: Insights from 2023 Customer Feedback

Asset Panda has established itself as a robust asset tracking platform, but even the most successful products can benefit from customer-driven enhancements. Based on reviews from 2023, we've identified three major areas where Asset Panda could improve its pricing model to better meet the needs of its users. These recommendations are grounded in actual customer experiences and aim to refine the platform's value proposition.

1. Develop a More Flexible Pricing Structure for Different Company Sizes

Customers have expressed that Asset Panda's pricing model seems more favorable to smaller organizations due to the per asset cost. This can be a limiting factor for larger enterprises with extensive asset inventories.

*Customer Quote: Pricing is geared towards smaller shops because of the per asset cost. - Michelle G., Web Designer, Enterprise (>1000 emp.)*

To address this, Asset Panda could introduce a tiered pricing system that offers volume discounts or custom pricing packages for larger companies. This would make the platform more accessible and cost-effective for enterprises with a significant number of assets to manage.

2. Simplify the Initial Setup Process to Reduce Time and Cost

The customizable nature of Asset Panda is a double-edged sword. While it allows for a high degree of personalization, it also leads to a time-consuming setup process. This can translate into higher costs, both in terms of time investment and potential need for additional support.

*Customer Quote: Because it is customizable, it takes a while to set up. - Michelle G., Web Designer, Enterprise (>1000 emp.)*

To improve this, Asset Panda could offer a range of pre-configured templates based on common industry practices or provide an option for guided setup services at a fixed rate. This would help new users get started more quickly and reduce the indirect costs associated with the setup phase.

3. Introduce a More Transparent Pricing Model for Better Budgeting

Some users may find it challenging to understand the full cost implications of Asset Panda's pricing due to its per asset structure. This can lead to budgeting challenges and unexpected expenses as the number of tracked assets grows.

*Customer Quote: Set up fields for different groups. Can be broken into different departments for sharing assets. - Michelle G., Web Designer, Enterprise (>1000 emp.)*

To enhance transparency, Asset Panda could provide clearer pricing tiers and a cost calculator that helps potential customers estimate their total investment based on their specific asset tracking needs. Additionally, offering a clear breakdown of what is included in each pricing tier would help customers make more informed decisions.

By addressing these three areas of improvement, Asset Panda can better align its pricing model with the diverse needs of its customer base, ensuring that the platform remains competitive and continues to deliver exceptional value to organizations of all sizes.

Subscribe to our Curly's Consulting newsletter

We publish insights on all things pricing strategy and monetization.
jamie@example.com
Contact Us